Bible-Centric Bible Translation (BCBT) produces a quality translation first (Produce → Publish → Engage), led by a translation agency, with life transformation as the intended outcome. Church-Centric Bible Translation (CCBT) begins by forming the lingual church (Engage → Produce → Publish); translation is a means, led by church leaders and done by believers into their own language as part of their formation. A church-based project can still be Bible-centric.
In From Unreached to Established (2018), we outline the key differences between CCBT and BCBT. These definitions comes from that paper:
Church-Centric Bible Translation (CCBT): a paradigm of Bible translation focused on the establishing and strengthening of a lingual church using a translation process that is led by leaders of the church and done by believers translating into their own language, as an integral part of their theological and spiritual formation. The church-centric paradigm has as its focus the establishing of the church, with Bible translation as a means to that end.
See also Church-Centric Bible Translation.
Bible-Centric Bible Translation (BCBT): a paradigm of Bible translation focused on the production of a quality Bible translation using an academic and linguistic process that is usually led by a translation agency and functions independent of (and sometimes in advance of) the theological and spiritual formation of the lingual church. The Bible-centric paradigm has as its focus the production of a Bible translation, with life transformation as the intended outcome.
See also Bible-Centric Bible Translation.
Church-Based Bible Translation (CBBT) is a broader category: the church itself does the translation work. CCBT is a subset of CBBT in which the aim is establishing the church, and translation is a means. The church can still run a Bible-centric project, producing a quality Bible first and leaving theological formation for later. Practitioners of the wider church-based movement also gather at churchbased.bible. This hub defines the church-centric paradigm.
established church: a church that is firmly rooted and grounded in sound doctrine (orthodoxy; cf. Eph. 4:11–16; Col. 2:5–7; 1 Cor. 15:58) and is characterized by faithful living (orthopraxy; cf. Eph. 4:1; Col. 1:10; 1 Thess. 2:12). Not synonymous with a “planted” church. Not the classic three-self rubric (self-supporting, self-propagating, self-governing), which addresses independence, not doctrinal integrity.
See also established church and establishing the church.
Church-centric is to evaluate everything from the viewpoint of the needs of establishing and equipping the church (Acts 14:21–23; 15:40–41; Eph. 4:11–16). The ultimate objective of missions is the establishing of the church in each people group in sound doctrine, with mature leadership and the ability to understand the Word of God and defend sound doctrine for the glory of God.
An established church is rooted in sound doctrine and faithful living, with mature leaders who can check, teach, and revise. A published Bible can sit with a church that still lacks those things. In the church-centric paradigm, church leaders use translation as a means of forming the lingual church.
Bible-centric work has served the church well: agencies put Scripture into languages that had none, ahead of other ministries, and God used that work to expand and establish churches. The misalignment is with today’s [[glossary#global-church|global church]]: churches that already exist and already want the Word in their own language. People still in Bible-centric work remain part of how God has served the church.
Church-centric work fits when a lingual church already exists and its leaders are ready to lead translation, and formation and ownership matter as much as a published book. When translation runs parallel to the church’s life rather than through it, the church does not own or use the result. Church leaders translate because they need the Scriptures to teach and obey, so the church relies on the text it makes, and checking and excellence stay in the work.
Agency (who leads) and focus (what is central) are different questions. Church leaders can run a church-based project whose real goal is still a quality Bible as fast as possible, with theological formation left for later. That is church-based, production-first work: the church does the translation, and the aim remains a published Bible.
When the Church Translates the Bible contrasts two orders of work.
Bible-centric | Church-centric | |
|---|---|---|
Focus | Production of a quality Bible translation | Establishing the lingual church |
Process | Produce → Publish → Engage | Engage → Produce → Publish |
Priority | A quality Bible, as fast as possible | Forming the church in theological capacity and translation experience |
What “done” looks like | A published Bible the church can then use | A church able to produce a [[trustworthy-and-trusted |
In the Bible-centric order, the church engages the finished book after production and publishing. In the church-centric order, the church already engages Scripture, in another language it understands or through oral ministry, and that engagement drives production and publishing. A draft that outruns the church’s ability to affirm it leaves the church unable to stand behind the text. The church is building capacity to translate, check, and keep the translation faithful over time.
Original content © unfoldingWord, CC BY-SA 4.0. Last reviewed 27 August 2026.